Amit's data tools
FuelFacts

HORMEL Canadian Style Bacon vs Pork, cured, ham

Side by side, per 100 g, from the same USDA reference data.

vs

Pork, cured, ham

315
kcal per 100 g
Higher calorie

Pork, cured, ham has more — 315 calories per 100 g against 122 for hormel canadian style bacon, a difference of 193 kcal (158% more). On protein it is HORMEL Canadian Style Bacon 16.9 g versus pork, cured, ham 12.8 g per 100 g.

Nutrient by nutrient, per 100 g

Per 100 gHORMEL Canadian Style BaconPork, cured, hamDifference
Calories122 kcal315 kcal193 kcal
Protein 16.9 g 12.8 g 4.1 g
Total fat 4.9 g 28.2 g 23.3 g
Saturated fat 1.8 g 10.1 g 8.3 g
Carbohydrate 1.9 g 1.7 g 0.2 g
Fibre — g 0.0 g
Sugars 1.4 g — g
Sodium 1,016.0 mg 1,088.0 mg 72.0 mg
Potassium 279.0 mg 239.0 mg 40.0 mg
Calcium 6.0 mg 8.0 mg 2.0 mg
Iron 0.9 mg 1.1 mg 0.2 mg
Vitamin C 1.4 mg 0.0 mg 1.4 mg
Vitamin A — µg 0.0 µg
Cholesterol 49.0 mg 70.0 mg 21.0 mg
Water 73.0 g 54.4 g 18.6 g

Highlighted cells are the higher of the two. "Higher" is not automatically "better" — it depends entirely on what you are trying to do.

Source: USDA FoodData Central, SR Legacy. General information only — not medical or nutrition advice. Values are averages for a food type and vary by brand, ripeness and preparation.

One family of free data tools