Amit's data tools
FuelFacts

Triticale vs Millet flour

Side by side, per 100 g, from the same USDA reference data.

Triticale

336
kcal per 100 g
vs

Millet flour

382
kcal per 100 g
Higher calorie

Millet flour has more — 382 calories per 100 g against 336 for triticale, a difference of 46 kcal (14% more). On protein it is Triticale 13.1 g versus millet flour 10.8 g per 100 g.

Nutrient by nutrient, per 100 g

Per 100 gTriticaleMillet flourDifference
Calories336 kcal382 kcal46 kcal
Protein 13.1 g 10.8 g 2.3 g
Total fat 2.1 g 4.3 g 2.2 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 0.5 g 0.2 g
Carbohydrate 72.1 g 75.1 g 3.0 g
Fibre — g 3.5 g
Sugars — g 1.7 g
Sodium 5.0 mg 4.0 mg 1.0 mg
Potassium 332.0 mg 224.0 mg 108.0 mg
Calcium 37.0 mg 14.0 mg 23.0 mg
Iron 2.6 mg 3.9 mg 1.4 mg
Vitamin C 0.0 mg 0.0 mg equal
Vitamin A 0.0 µg — µg
Cholesterol 0.0 mg — mg
Water 10.5 g 8.7 g 1.8 g

Highlighted cells are the higher of the two. "Higher" is not automatically "better" — it depends entirely on what you are trying to do.

Source: USDA FoodData Central, SR Legacy. General information only — not medical or nutrition advice. Values are averages for a food type and vary by brand, ripeness and preparation.

One family of free data tools