Amit's data tools
FuelFacts

Restaurant, family style, hash browns vs Restaurant, family style, onion rings

Side by side, per 100 g, from the same USDA reference data.

vs

Restaurant, family style, onion rings

356
kcal per 100 g
Higher calorie

Restaurant, family style, onion rings has more — 356 calories per 100 g against 197 for restaurant, family style, hash browns, a difference of 159 kcal (81% more). On protein it is Restaurant, family style, hash browns 2.5 g versus restaurant, family style, onion rings 4.9 g per 100 g.

Nutrient by nutrient, per 100 g

Per 100 gRestaurant, family style, hash brownsRestaurant, family style, onion ringsDifference
Calories197 kcal356 kcal159 kcal
Protein 2.5 g 4.9 g 2.4 g
Total fat 9.0 g 19.3 g 10.3 g
Saturated fat 1.7 g 3.4 g 1.7 g
Carbohydrate 26.6 g 40.7 g 14.1 g
Fibre 2.7 g 2.6 g 0.1 g
Sugars 1.4 g 4.7 g 3.3 g
Sodium 468.0 mg 692.0 mg 224.0 mg
Potassium 416.0 mg 142.0 mg 274.0 mg
Calcium 17.0 mg 21.0 mg 4.0 mg
Iron 0.6 mg 0.7 mg 0.1 mg
Vitamin C 0.0 mg — mg
Vitamin A — µg 1.0 µg
Water 59.9 g 32.9 g 27.0 g

Highlighted cells are the higher of the two. "Higher" is not automatically "better" — it depends entirely on what you are trying to do.

Source: USDA FoodData Central, SR Legacy. General information only — not medical or nutrition advice. Values are averages for a food type and vary by brand, ripeness and preparation.

One family of free data tools