Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken vs Restaurant, family style, hash browns
Side by side, per 100 g, from the same USDA reference data.
vs
Restaurant, family style, hash browns has more — 197 calories per 100 g against 129 for restaurant, chinese, kung pao chicken, a difference of 68 kcal (53% more). On protein it is Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken 9.8 g versus restaurant, family style, hash browns 2.5 g per 100 g.
Nutrient by nutrient, per 100 g
| Per 100 g | Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken | Restaurant, family style, hash browns | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 129 kcal | 197 kcal | 68 kcal |
| Protein | 9.8 g | 2.5 g | 7.3 g |
| Total fat | 7.0 g | 9.0 g | 2.0 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.4 g | 1.7 g | 0.3 g |
| Carbohydrate | 6.9 g | 26.6 g | 19.7 g |
| Fibre | 1.5 g | 2.7 g | 1.2 g |
| Sugars | 3.0 g | 1.4 g | 1.7 g |
| Sodium | 402.0 mg | 468.0 mg | 66.0 mg |
| Potassium | 218.0 mg | 416.0 mg | 198.0 mg |
| Calcium | 20.0 mg | 17.0 mg | 3.0 mg |
| Iron | 0.8 mg | 0.6 mg | 0.2 mg |
| Vitamin C | 7.1 mg | 0.0 mg | 7.1 mg |
| Vitamin A | 65.0 µg | — µg | — |
| Cholesterol | 26.0 mg | — mg | — |
| Water | 74.8 g | 59.9 g | 14.9 g |
Highlighted cells are the higher of the two. "Higher" is not automatically "better" — it depends entirely on what you are trying to do.
Source: USDA FoodData Central, SR Legacy. General information only — not medical or nutrition advice. Values are averages for a food type and vary by brand, ripeness and preparation.