Restaurant, family style, onion rings vs Restaurant, Chinese, chicken chow mein
Side by side, per 100 g, from the same USDA reference data.
vs
Restaurant, family style, onion rings has more — 356 calories per 100 g against 85 for restaurant, chinese, chicken chow mein, a difference of 271 kcal (319% more). On protein it is Restaurant, family style, onion rings 4.9 g versus restaurant, chinese, chicken chow mein 6.8 g per 100 g.
Nutrient by nutrient, per 100 g
| Per 100 g | Restaurant, family style, onion rings | Restaurant, Chinese, chicken chow mein | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 356 kcal | 85 kcal | 271 kcal |
| Protein | 4.9 g | 6.8 g | 1.9 g |
| Total fat | 19.3 g | 2.8 g | 16.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.4 g | 0.5 g | 2.9 g |
| Carbohydrate | 40.7 g | 8.3 g | 32.4 g |
| Fibre | 2.6 g | 1.0 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 4.7 g | 1.7 g | 2.9 g |
| Sodium | 692.0 mg | 311.0 mg | 381.0 mg |
| Potassium | 142.0 mg | 124.0 mg | 18.0 mg |
| Calcium | 21.0 mg | 21.0 mg | equal |
| Iron | 0.7 mg | 0.7 mg | 0.0 mg |
| Vitamin C | — mg | 2.0 mg | — |
| Vitamin A | 1.0 µg | 19.0 µg | 18.0 µg |
| Cholesterol | — mg | 16.0 mg | — |
| Water | 32.9 g | 81.0 g | 48.1 g |
Highlighted cells are the higher of the two. "Higher" is not automatically "better" — it depends entirely on what you are trying to do.
Source: USDA FoodData Central, SR Legacy. General information only — not medical or nutrition advice. Values are averages for a food type and vary by brand, ripeness and preparation.