Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken vs Restaurant, family style, onion rings
Side by side, per 100 g, from the same USDA reference data.
vs
Restaurant, family style, onion rings has more — 356 calories per 100 g against 129 for restaurant, chinese, kung pao chicken, a difference of 227 kcal (176% more). On protein it is Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken 9.8 g versus restaurant, family style, onion rings 4.9 g per 100 g.
Nutrient by nutrient, per 100 g
| Per 100 g | Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken | Restaurant, family style, onion rings | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 129 kcal | 356 kcal | 227 kcal |
| Protein | 9.8 g | 4.9 g | 4.9 g |
| Total fat | 7.0 g | 19.3 g | 12.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.4 g | 3.4 g | 2.1 g |
| Carbohydrate | 6.9 g | 40.7 g | 33.9 g |
| Fibre | 1.5 g | 2.6 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 3.0 g | 4.7 g | 1.7 g |
| Sodium | 402.0 mg | 692.0 mg | 290.0 mg |
| Potassium | 218.0 mg | 142.0 mg | 76.0 mg |
| Calcium | 20.0 mg | 21.0 mg | 1.0 mg |
| Iron | 0.8 mg | 0.7 mg | 0.1 mg |
| Vitamin C | 7.1 mg | — mg | — |
| Vitamin A | 65.0 µg | 1.0 µg | 64.0 µg |
| Cholesterol | 26.0 mg | — mg | — |
| Water | 74.8 g | 32.9 g | 41.9 g |
Highlighted cells are the higher of the two. "Higher" is not automatically "better" — it depends entirely on what you are trying to do.
Source: USDA FoodData Central, SR Legacy. General information only — not medical or nutrition advice. Values are averages for a food type and vary by brand, ripeness and preparation.