Amit's data tools
FuelFacts

Ostrich, fan, raw vs Emu, full rump, raw

Side by side, per 100 g, from the same USDA reference data.

Ostrich, fan, raw

117
kcal per 100 g
Higher calorie
vs

Emu, full rump, raw

112
kcal per 100 g

Ostrich, fan, raw has more — 117 calories per 100 g against 112 for emu, full rump, raw, a difference of 5 kcal (4% more). On protein it is Ostrich, fan, raw 21.8 g versus emu, full rump, raw 22.8 g per 100 g.

Nutrient by nutrient, per 100 g

Per 100 gOstrich, fan, rawEmu, full rump, rawDifference
Calories117 kcal112 kcal5 kcal
Protein 21.8 g 22.8 g 1.0 g
Total fat 2.7 g 1.6 g 1.0 g
Saturated fat 1.0 g 0.5 g 0.5 g
Carbohydrate 0.0 g 0.0 g equal
Fibre 0.0 g 0.0 g equal
Sugars 0.0 g 0.0 g equal
Sodium 75.0 mg 90.0 mg 15.0 mg
Potassium 308.0 mg 330.0 mg 22.0 mg
Calcium 6.0 mg 4.0 mg 2.0 mg
Iron 4.4 mg 5.0 mg 0.6 mg
Vitamin C 0.0 mg 0.0 mg equal
Vitamin A 0.0 µg 4.0 µg 4.0 µg
Cholesterol 73.0 mg 85.0 mg 12.0 mg
Water 75.9 g 73.8 g 2.1 g

Highlighted cells are the higher of the two. "Higher" is not automatically "better" — it depends entirely on what you are trying to do.

Source: USDA FoodData Central, SR Legacy. General information only — not medical or nutrition advice. Values are averages for a food type and vary by brand, ripeness and preparation.

One family of free data tools