Head to head

Okra, raw vs Eppaw, raw

Side by side, per 100 g, from the same USDA reference data.

Eppaw, raw

150

kcal per 100 g

Higher calorie

Eppaw, raw has more — 150 calories per 100 g against 33 for okra, raw, a difference of 117 kcal (355% more). On protein it is Okra, raw 1.9 g versus eppaw, raw 4.6 g per 100 g.

SOURCE·USDA SR Legacy·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Nutrient by nutrient, per 100 g

Per 100 g	Okra, raw	Eppaw, raw	Difference
Calories	33 kcal	150 kcal	117 kcal
Protein	1.9 g	4.6 g	2.7 g
Total fat	0.2 g	1.8 g	1.6 g
Saturated fat	0.0 g	— g	—
Carbohydrate	7.5 g	31.7 g	24.2 g
Fibre	3.2 g	— g	—
Sugars	1.5 g	— g	—
Sodium	7.0 mg	12.0 mg	5.0 mg
Potassium	299.0 mg	340.0 mg	41.0 mg
Calcium	82.0 mg	110.0 mg	28.0 mg
Iron	0.6 mg	1.2 mg	0.5 mg
Vitamin C	23.0 mg	13.0 mg	10.0 mg
Vitamin A	36.0 µg	0.0 µg	36.0 µg
Cholesterol	0.0 mg	0.0 mg	equal
Water	89.6 g	60.0 g	29.6 g

Highlighted cells are the higher of the two. "Higher" is not automatically "better" — it depends entirely on what you are trying to do.

SOURCE·USDA SR Legacy·REVIEWED JUL 2026

How this is worked out

Both columns are the same USDA release, per 100 g of edible portion — the only basis on which two different foods can honestly be set side by side.
The difference column is the two published figures subtracted, not a scaled or normalised score.
The percentage in the answer is the higher figure over the lower, minus one — a ratio, so it does not change with serving size.

difference = |A − B|                (per 100 g)
"% more"   = (higher ÷ lower − 1) × 100

Full data & method →

The question this page settles

Which has more calories, okra, raw or eppaw, raw?