Millet, raw vs Teff, cooked
Side by side, per 100 g, from the same USDA reference data.
Millet, raw has more — 378 calories per 100 g against 101 for teff, cooked, a difference of 277 kcal (274% more). On protein it is Millet, raw 11.0 g versus teff, cooked 3.9 g per 100 g.
Nutrient by nutrient, per 100 g
| Per 100 g | Millet, raw | Teff, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 378 kcal | 101 kcal | 277 kcal |
| Protein | 11.0 g | 3.9 g | 7.1 g |
| Total fat | 4.2 g | 0.7 g | 3.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | — g | — |
| Carbohydrate | 72.9 g | 19.9 g | 53.0 g |
| Fibre | 8.5 g | 2.8 g | 5.7 g |
| Sodium | 5.0 mg | 8.0 mg | 3.0 mg |
| Potassium | 195.0 mg | 107.0 mg | 88.0 mg |
| Calcium | 8.0 mg | 49.0 mg | 41.0 mg |
| Iron | 3.0 mg | 2.1 mg | 1.0 mg |
| Vitamin C | 0.0 mg | — mg | — |
| Vitamin A | 0.0 µg | 0.0 µg | equal |
| Cholesterol | 0.0 mg | 0.0 mg | equal |
| Water | 8.7 g | 74.9 g | 66.3 g |
Highlighted cells are the higher of the two. "Higher" is not automatically "better" — it depends entirely on what you are trying to do.
Source: USDA FoodData Central, SR Legacy. General information only — not medical or nutrition advice. Values are averages for a food type and vary by brand, ripeness and preparation.