Amit's data tools
FuelFacts

Kale, raw vs Taro, raw

Side by side, per 100 g, from the same USDA reference data.

Kale, raw

35
kcal per 100 g
vs

Taro, raw

112
kcal per 100 g
Higher calorie

Taro, raw has more — 112 calories per 100 g against 35 for kale, raw, a difference of 77 kcal (220% more). On protein it is Kale, raw 2.9 g versus taro, raw 1.5 g per 100 g.

Nutrient by nutrient, per 100 g

Per 100 gKale, rawTaro, rawDifference
Calories35 kcal112 kcal77 kcal
Protein 2.9 g 1.5 g 1.4 g
Total fat 1.5 g 0.2 g 1.3 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0.0 g 0.1 g
Carbohydrate 4.4 g 26.5 g 22.0 g
Fibre 4.1 g 4.1 g equal
Sugars 1.0 g 0.4 g 0.6 g
Sodium 53.0 mg 11.0 mg 42.0 mg
Potassium 348.0 mg 591.0 mg 243.0 mg
Calcium 254.0 mg 43.0 mg 211.0 mg
Iron 1.6 mg 0.6 mg 1.1 mg
Vitamin C 93.4 mg 4.5 mg 88.9 mg
Vitamin A 241.0 µg 4.0 µg 237.0 µg
Cholesterol 0.0 mg 0.0 mg equal
Water 89.6 g 70.6 g 19.0 g

Highlighted cells are the higher of the two. "Higher" is not automatically "better" — it depends entirely on what you are trying to do.

Source: USDA FoodData Central, SR Legacy. General information only — not medical or nutrition advice. Values are averages for a food type and vary by brand, ripeness and preparation.

One family of free data tools