Amit's data tools
FuelFacts

Frog legs, raw vs Fish, tuna salad

Side by side, per 100 g, from the same USDA reference data.

Frog legs, raw

73
kcal per 100 g
vs

Fish, tuna salad

187
kcal per 100 g
Higher calorie

Fish, tuna salad has more — 187 calories per 100 g against 73 for frog legs, raw, a difference of 114 kcal (156% more). On protein it is Frog legs, raw 16.4 g versus fish, tuna salad 16.0 g per 100 g.

Nutrient by nutrient, per 100 g

Per 100 gFrog legs, rawFish, tuna saladDifference
Calories73 kcal187 kcal114 kcal
Protein 16.4 g 16.0 g 0.4 g
Total fat 0.3 g 9.3 g 9.0 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 1.5 g 1.5 g
Carbohydrate 0.0 g 9.4 g 9.4 g
Fibre 0.0 g 0.0 g equal
Sugars 0.0 g — g
Sodium 58.0 mg 402.0 mg 344.0 mg
Potassium 285.0 mg 178.0 mg 107.0 mg
Calcium 18.0 mg 17.0 mg 1.0 mg
Iron 1.5 mg 1.0 mg 0.5 mg
Vitamin C 0.0 mg 2.2 mg 2.2 mg
Vitamin A 15.0 µg 24.0 µg 9.0 µg
Cholesterol 50.0 mg 13.0 mg 37.0 mg
Water 81.9 g 63.2 g 18.7 g

Highlighted cells are the higher of the two. "Higher" is not automatically "better" — it depends entirely on what you are trying to do.

Source: USDA FoodData Central, SR Legacy. General information only — not medical or nutrition advice. Values are averages for a food type and vary by brand, ripeness and preparation.

One family of free data tools