Fish, tuna salad vs Fish, ling, raw
Side by side, per 100 g, from the same USDA reference data.
Fish, tuna salad has more — 187 calories per 100 g against 87 for fish, ling, raw, a difference of 100 kcal (115% more). On protein it is Fish, tuna salad 16.0 g versus fish, ling, raw 19.0 g per 100 g.
Nutrient by nutrient, per 100 g
| Per 100 g | Fish, tuna salad | Fish, ling, raw | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 187 kcal | 87 kcal | 100 kcal |
| Protein | 16.0 g | 19.0 g | 2.9 g |
| Total fat | 9.3 g | 0.6 g | 8.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.5 g | 0.1 g | 1.4 g |
| Carbohydrate | 9.4 g | 0.0 g | 9.4 g |
| Fibre | 0.0 g | 0.0 g | equal |
| Sodium | 402.0 mg | 135.0 mg | 267.0 mg |
| Potassium | 178.0 mg | 379.0 mg | 201.0 mg |
| Calcium | 17.0 mg | 34.0 mg | 17.0 mg |
| Iron | 1.0 mg | 0.7 mg | 0.4 mg |
| Vitamin C | 2.2 mg | 0.0 mg | 2.2 mg |
| Vitamin A | 24.0 µg | 30.0 µg | 6.0 µg |
| Cholesterol | 13.0 mg | 40.0 mg | 27.0 mg |
| Water | 63.2 g | 79.6 g | 16.5 g |
Highlighted cells are the higher of the two. "Higher" is not automatically "better" — it depends entirely on what you are trying to do.
Source: USDA FoodData Central, SR Legacy. General information only — not medical or nutrition advice. Values are averages for a food type and vary by brand, ripeness and preparation.