Amit's data tools
FuelFacts

Fish, scup, raw vs Fish, cisco, raw

Side by side, per 100 g, from the same USDA reference data.

Fish, scup, raw

105
kcal per 100 g
Higher calorie
vs

Fish, cisco, raw

98
kcal per 100 g

Fish, scup, raw has more — 105 calories per 100 g against 98 for fish, cisco, raw, a difference of 7 kcal (7% more). On protein it is Fish, scup, raw 18.9 g versus fish, cisco, raw 19.0 g per 100 g.

Nutrient by nutrient, per 100 g

Per 100 gFish, scup, rawFish, cisco, rawDifference
Calories105 kcal98 kcal7 kcal
Protein 18.9 g 19.0 g 0.1 g
Total fat 2.7 g 1.9 g 0.8 g
Saturated fat 0.6 g 0.4 g 0.2 g
Carbohydrate 0.0 g 0.0 g equal
Fibre 0.0 g 0.0 g equal
Sugars 0.0 g — g
Sodium 42.0 mg 55.0 mg 13.0 mg
Potassium 287.0 mg 354.0 mg 67.0 mg
Calcium 40.0 mg 12.0 mg 28.0 mg
Iron 0.5 mg 0.4 mg 0.1 mg
Vitamin C 0.0 mg 0.0 mg equal
Vitamin A 27.0 µg 30.0 µg 3.0 µg
Cholesterol 52.0 mg 50.0 mg 2.0 mg
Water 75.4 g 78.9 g 3.6 g

Highlighted cells are the higher of the two. "Higher" is not automatically "better" — it depends entirely on what you are trying to do.

Source: USDA FoodData Central, SR Legacy. General information only — not medical or nutrition advice. Values are averages for a food type and vary by brand, ripeness and preparation.

One family of free data tools