Amit's data tools
FuelFacts

Fish, scup, raw vs Fish, burbot, raw

Side by side, per 100 g, from the same USDA reference data.

Fish, scup, raw

105
kcal per 100 g
Higher calorie
vs

Fish, burbot, raw

90
kcal per 100 g

Fish, scup, raw has more — 105 calories per 100 g against 90 for fish, burbot, raw, a difference of 15 kcal (17% more). On protein it is Fish, scup, raw 18.9 g versus fish, burbot, raw 19.3 g per 100 g.

Nutrient by nutrient, per 100 g

Per 100 gFish, scup, rawFish, burbot, rawDifference
Calories105 kcal90 kcal15 kcal
Protein 18.9 g 19.3 g 0.4 g
Total fat 2.7 g 0.8 g 1.9 g
Saturated fat 0.6 g 0.2 g 0.5 g
Carbohydrate 0.0 g 0.0 g equal
Fibre 0.0 g 0.0 g equal
Sugars 0.0 g — g
Sodium 42.0 mg 97.0 mg 55.0 mg
Potassium 287.0 mg 404.0 mg 117.0 mg
Calcium 40.0 mg 50.0 mg 10.0 mg
Iron 0.5 mg 0.9 mg 0.4 mg
Vitamin C 0.0 mg 0.0 mg equal
Vitamin A 27.0 µg 5.0 µg 22.0 µg
Cholesterol 52.0 mg 60.0 mg 8.0 mg
Water 75.4 g 79.3 g 3.9 g

Highlighted cells are the higher of the two. "Higher" is not automatically "better" — it depends entirely on what you are trying to do.

Source: USDA FoodData Central, SR Legacy. General information only — not medical or nutrition advice. Values are averages for a food type and vary by brand, ripeness and preparation.

One family of free data tools