Amit's data tools
FuelFacts

Fish, ling, raw vs Fish, scup, raw

Side by side, per 100 g, from the same USDA reference data.

Fish, ling, raw

87
kcal per 100 g
vs

Fish, scup, raw

105
kcal per 100 g
Higher calorie

Fish, scup, raw has more — 105 calories per 100 g against 87 for fish, ling, raw, a difference of 18 kcal (21% more). On protein it is Fish, ling, raw 19.0 g versus fish, scup, raw 18.9 g per 100 g.

Nutrient by nutrient, per 100 g

Per 100 gFish, ling, rawFish, scup, rawDifference
Calories87 kcal105 kcal18 kcal
Protein 19.0 g 18.9 g 0.1 g
Total fat 0.6 g 2.7 g 2.1 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.6 g 0.5 g
Carbohydrate 0.0 g 0.0 g equal
Fibre 0.0 g 0.0 g equal
Sugars — g 0.0 g
Sodium 135.0 mg 42.0 mg 93.0 mg
Potassium 379.0 mg 287.0 mg 92.0 mg
Calcium 34.0 mg 40.0 mg 6.0 mg
Iron 0.7 mg 0.5 mg 0.1 mg
Vitamin C 0.0 mg 0.0 mg equal
Vitamin A 30.0 µg 27.0 µg 3.0 µg
Cholesterol 40.0 mg 52.0 mg 12.0 mg
Water 79.6 g 75.4 g 4.3 g

Highlighted cells are the higher of the two. "Higher" is not automatically "better" — it depends entirely on what you are trying to do.

Source: USDA FoodData Central, SR Legacy. General information only — not medical or nutrition advice. Values are averages for a food type and vary by brand, ripeness and preparation.

One family of free data tools