Fish, ling, raw vs Fish, cisco, raw
Side by side, per 100 g, from the same USDA reference data.
Fish, cisco, raw has more — 98 calories per 100 g against 87 for fish, ling, raw, a difference of 11 kcal (13% more). On protein it is Fish, ling, raw 19.0 g versus fish, cisco, raw 19.0 g per 100 g.
Nutrient by nutrient, per 100 g
| Per 100 g | Fish, ling, raw | Fish, cisco, raw | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 87 kcal | 98 kcal | 11 kcal |
| Protein | 19.0 g | 19.0 g | equal |
| Total fat | 0.6 g | 1.9 g | 1.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.4 g | 0.3 g |
| Carbohydrate | 0.0 g | 0.0 g | equal |
| Fibre | 0.0 g | 0.0 g | equal |
| Sodium | 135.0 mg | 55.0 mg | 80.0 mg |
| Potassium | 379.0 mg | 354.0 mg | 25.0 mg |
| Calcium | 34.0 mg | 12.0 mg | 22.0 mg |
| Iron | 0.7 mg | 0.4 mg | 0.3 mg |
| Vitamin C | 0.0 mg | 0.0 mg | equal |
| Vitamin A | 30.0 µg | 30.0 µg | equal |
| Cholesterol | 40.0 mg | 50.0 mg | 10.0 mg |
| Water | 79.6 g | 78.9 g | 0.7 g |
Highlighted cells are the higher of the two. "Higher" is not automatically "better" — it depends entirely on what you are trying to do.
Source: USDA FoodData Central, SR Legacy. General information only — not medical or nutrition advice. Values are averages for a food type and vary by brand, ripeness and preparation.