Fish, cusk, raw vs Fish, ling, raw
Side by side, per 100 g, from the same USDA reference data.
Fish, cusk, raw has more — 87 calories per 100 g against 87 for fish, ling, raw, a difference of 0 kcal (0% more). On protein it is Fish, cusk, raw 19.0 g versus fish, ling, raw 19.0 g per 100 g.
Nutrient by nutrient, per 100 g
| Per 100 g | Fish, cusk, raw | Fish, ling, raw | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 87 kcal | 87 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Protein | 19.0 g | 19.0 g | equal |
| Total fat | 0.7 g | 0.6 g | 0.0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g | 0.0 g |
| Carbohydrate | 0.0 g | 0.0 g | equal |
| Fibre | 0.0 g | 0.0 g | equal |
| Sodium | 31.0 mg | 135.0 mg | 104.0 mg |
| Potassium | 392.0 mg | 379.0 mg | 13.0 mg |
| Calcium | 10.0 mg | 34.0 mg | 24.0 mg |
| Iron | 0.8 mg | 0.7 mg | 0.2 mg |
| Vitamin C | 0.0 mg | 0.0 mg | equal |
| Vitamin A | 18.0 µg | 30.0 µg | 12.0 µg |
| Cholesterol | 41.0 mg | 40.0 mg | 1.0 mg |
| Water | 76.4 g | 79.6 g | 3.3 g |
Highlighted cells are the higher of the two. "Higher" is not automatically "better" — it depends entirely on what you are trying to do.
Source: USDA FoodData Central, SR Legacy. General information only — not medical or nutrition advice. Values are averages for a food type and vary by brand, ripeness and preparation.