Amit's data tools
FuelFacts

Fish, cisco, raw vs Fish, tuna, fresh

Side by side, per 100 g, from the same USDA reference data.

Fish, cisco, raw

98
kcal per 100 g
vs

Fish, tuna, fresh

144
kcal per 100 g
Higher calorie

Fish, tuna, fresh has more — 144 calories per 100 g against 98 for fish, cisco, raw, a difference of 46 kcal (47% more). On protein it is Fish, cisco, raw 19.0 g versus fish, tuna, fresh 23.3 g per 100 g.

Nutrient by nutrient, per 100 g

Per 100 gFish, cisco, rawFish, tuna, freshDifference
Calories98 kcal144 kcal46 kcal
Protein 19.0 g 23.3 g 4.3 g
Total fat 1.9 g 4.9 g 3.0 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 1.3 g 0.8 g
Carbohydrate 0.0 g 0.0 g equal
Fibre 0.0 g 0.0 g equal
Sugars — g 0.0 g
Sodium 55.0 mg 39.0 mg 16.0 mg
Potassium 354.0 mg 252.0 mg 102.0 mg
Calcium 12.0 mg 8.0 mg 4.0 mg
Iron 0.4 mg 1.0 mg 0.6 mg
Vitamin C 0.0 mg 0.0 mg equal
Vitamin A 30.0 µg 655.0 µg 625.0 µg
Cholesterol 50.0 mg 38.0 mg 12.0 mg
Water 78.9 g 68.1 g 10.8 g

Highlighted cells are the higher of the two. "Higher" is not automatically "better" — it depends entirely on what you are trying to do.

Source: USDA FoodData Central, SR Legacy. General information only — not medical or nutrition advice. Values are averages for a food type and vary by brand, ripeness and preparation.

One family of free data tools