Amit's data tools
FuelFacts

Fish, burbot, raw vs Fish, tuna, fresh

Side by side, per 100 g, from the same USDA reference data.

Fish, burbot, raw

90
kcal per 100 g
vs

Fish, tuna, fresh

103
kcal per 100 g
Higher calorie

Fish, tuna, fresh has more — 103 calories per 100 g against 90 for fish, burbot, raw, a difference of 13 kcal (14% more). On protein it is Fish, burbot, raw 19.3 g versus fish, tuna, fresh 22.0 g per 100 g.

Nutrient by nutrient, per 100 g

Per 100 gFish, burbot, rawFish, tuna, freshDifference
Calories90 kcal103 kcal13 kcal
Protein 19.3 g 22.0 g 2.7 g
Total fat 0.8 g 1.0 g 0.2 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0.3 g 0.2 g
Carbohydrate 0.0 g 0.0 g equal
Fibre 0.0 g 0.0 g equal
Sodium 97.0 mg 37.0 mg 60.0 mg
Potassium 404.0 mg 407.0 mg 3.0 mg
Calcium 50.0 mg 29.0 mg 21.0 mg
Iron 0.9 mg 1.3 mg 0.4 mg
Vitamin C 0.0 mg 1.0 mg 1.0 mg
Vitamin A 5.0 µg 16.0 µg 11.0 µg
Cholesterol 60.0 mg 47.0 mg 13.0 mg
Water 79.3 g 70.6 g 8.7 g

Highlighted cells are the higher of the two. "Higher" is not automatically "better" — it depends entirely on what you are trying to do.

Source: USDA FoodData Central, SR Legacy. General information only — not medical or nutrition advice. Values are averages for a food type and vary by brand, ripeness and preparation.

One family of free data tools