Amit's data tools
FuelFacts

Fish, burbot, raw vs Fish, tuna, fresh

Side by side, per 100 g, from the same USDA reference data.

Fish, burbot, raw

90
kcal per 100 g
vs

Fish, tuna, fresh

144
kcal per 100 g
Higher calorie

Fish, tuna, fresh has more — 144 calories per 100 g against 90 for fish, burbot, raw, a difference of 54 kcal (60% more). On protein it is Fish, burbot, raw 19.3 g versus fish, tuna, fresh 23.3 g per 100 g.

Nutrient by nutrient, per 100 g

Per 100 gFish, burbot, rawFish, tuna, freshDifference
Calories90 kcal144 kcal54 kcal
Protein 19.3 g 23.3 g 4.0 g
Total fat 0.8 g 4.9 g 4.1 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 1.3 g 1.1 g
Carbohydrate 0.0 g 0.0 g equal
Fibre 0.0 g 0.0 g equal
Sugars — g 0.0 g
Sodium 97.0 mg 39.0 mg 58.0 mg
Potassium 404.0 mg 252.0 mg 152.0 mg
Calcium 50.0 mg 8.0 mg 42.0 mg
Iron 0.9 mg 1.0 mg 0.1 mg
Vitamin C 0.0 mg 0.0 mg equal
Vitamin A 5.0 µg 655.0 µg 650.0 µg
Cholesterol 60.0 mg 38.0 mg 22.0 mg
Water 79.3 g 68.1 g 11.2 g

Highlighted cells are the higher of the two. "Higher" is not automatically "better" — it depends entirely on what you are trying to do.

Source: USDA FoodData Central, SR Legacy. General information only — not medical or nutrition advice. Values are averages for a food type and vary by brand, ripeness and preparation.

One family of free data tools