Head to head

Fat, goose vs Fat, turkey

Side by side, per 100 g, from the same USDA reference data.

Fat, turkey

900

kcal per 100 g

Fat, goose has more — 900 calories per 100 g against 900 for fat, turkey, a difference of 0 kcal (0% more). On protein it is Fat, goose 0.0 g versus fat, turkey 0.0 g per 100 g.

SOURCE·USDA SR Legacy·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Nutrient by nutrient, per 100 g

Per 100 g	Fat, goose	Fat, turkey	Difference
Calories	900 kcal	900 kcal	0 kcal
Protein	0.0 g	0.0 g	equal
Total fat	99.8 g	99.8 g	equal
Saturated fat	27.7 g	29.4 g	1.7 g
Carbohydrate	0.0 g	0.0 g	equal
Fibre	0.0 g	0.0 g	equal
Sugars	— g	0.0 g	—
Sodium	0.0 mg	0.0 mg	equal
Potassium	0.0 mg	0.0 mg	equal
Calcium	0.0 mg	0.0 mg	equal
Iron	0.0 mg	0.0 mg	equal
Vitamin C	0.0 mg	0.0 mg	equal
Vitamin A	0.0 µg	0.0 µg	equal
Cholesterol	100.0 mg	102.0 mg	2.0 mg
Water	0.2 g	0.2 g	equal

Highlighted cells are the higher of the two. "Higher" is not automatically "better" — it depends entirely on what you are trying to do.

SOURCE·USDA SR Legacy·REVIEWED JUL 2026

How this is worked out

Both columns are the same USDA release, per 100 g of edible portion — the only basis on which two different foods can honestly be set side by side.
The difference column is the two published figures subtracted, not a scaled or normalised score.
The percentage in the answer is the higher figure over the lower, minus one — a ratio, so it does not change with serving size.

difference = |A − B|                (per 100 g)
"% more"   = (higher ÷ lower − 1) × 100

Full data & method →

The question this page settles

Which has more calories, fat, goose or fat, turkey?