Amit's data tools
FuelFacts

BURGER KING, Onion Rings vs Fast foods, chicken tenders

Side by side, per 100 g, from the same USDA reference data.

BURGER KING, Onion Rings

417
kcal per 100 g
Higher calorie
vs

BURGER KING, Onion Rings has more — 417 calories per 100 g against 271 for fast foods, chicken tenders, a difference of 146 kcal (54% more). On protein it is BURGER KING, Onion Rings 3.9 g versus fast foods, chicken tenders 19.2 g per 100 g.

Nutrient by nutrient, per 100 g

Per 100 gBURGER KING, Onion RingsFast foods, chicken tendersDifference
Calories417 kcal271 kcal146 kcal
Protein 3.9 g 19.2 g 15.4 g
Total fat 25.2 g 14.0 g 11.3 g
Saturated fat 4.2 g 2.5 g 1.7 g
Carbohydrate 43.6 g 17.3 g 26.3 g
Fibre 2.7 g 1.2 g 1.5 g
Sugars 5.4 g 0.4 g 5.0 g
Sodium 776.0 mg 769.0 mg 7.0 mg
Potassium 167.0 mg 373.0 mg 206.0 mg
Calcium 115.0 mg 17.0 mg 98.0 mg
Iron 0.8 mg 0.7 mg 0.1 mg
Vitamin C 1.4 mg 1.1 mg 0.3 mg
Vitamin A 0.0 µg 3.0 µg 3.0 µg
Cholesterol — mg 48.0 mg
Water 24.5 g 46.6 g 22.1 g

Highlighted cells are the higher of the two. "Higher" is not automatically "better" — it depends entirely on what you are trying to do.

Source: USDA FoodData Central, SR Legacy. General information only — not medical or nutrition advice. Values are averages for a food type and vary by brand, ripeness and preparation.

One family of free data tools