BURGER KING, Hamburger vs Fast foods, chicken tenders
Side by side, per 100 g, from the same USDA reference data.
vs
Fast foods, chicken tenders has more — 271 calories per 100 g against 261 for burger king, hamburger, a difference of 10 kcal (4% more). On protein it is BURGER KING, Hamburger 14.9 g versus fast foods, chicken tenders 19.2 g per 100 g.
Nutrient by nutrient, per 100 g
| Per 100 g | BURGER KING, Hamburger | Fast foods, chicken tenders | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 261 kcal | 271 kcal | 10 kcal |
| Protein | 14.9 g | 19.2 g | 4.4 g |
| Total fat | 10.6 g | 14.0 g | 3.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.8 g | 2.5 g | 1.3 g |
| Carbohydrate | 26.8 g | 17.3 g | 9.5 g |
| Fibre | 1.0 g | 1.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 5.6 g | 0.4 g | 5.2 g |
| Sodium | 461.0 mg | 769.0 mg | 308.0 mg |
| Potassium | 217.0 mg | 373.0 mg | 156.0 mg |
| Calcium | 76.0 mg | 17.0 mg | 59.0 mg |
| Iron | 2.9 mg | 0.7 mg | 2.1 mg |
| Vitamin C | 0.2 mg | 1.1 mg | 0.9 mg |
| Vitamin A | — µg | 3.0 µg | — |
| Cholesterol | 35.0 mg | 48.0 mg | 13.0 mg |
| Water | 46.0 g | 46.6 g | 0.7 g |
Highlighted cells are the higher of the two. "Higher" is not automatically "better" — it depends entirely on what you are trying to do.
Source: USDA FoodData Central, SR Legacy. General information only — not medical or nutrition advice. Values are averages for a food type and vary by brand, ripeness and preparation.